DEI Rollbacks Are a Legal Time Bomb—Here’s Why Your Company Should Be Worried
If this article speaks to you, you'll love my new book, The Equity Edge: How Addressing Bias in Recruiting and Retention Drives Success.
This piece is part of an ongoing series responding to the wave of DEI rollbacks and resistance. Each article offers thoughtful strategies to help you lead in ways that increase diversity and retention—without harm. Pre-order The Equity Edge now and receive The Equity Edge Instructor Guide FREE—a limited-time offer designed to help you bring these practices into your workplace with care, courage, and clarity.
In recent months, many companies have scaled back or outright eliminated their DEI programs. Target, for example, quietly ended its DEI efforts, cutting funding for supplier diversity and ending its racial equity initiative that had committed $2 billion to Black-owned businesses. Likewise, Walmart has rolled back its DEI initiatives, including not renewing a five-year commitment to a racial equity center established in 2020 and pulling out of a prominent gay rights index.
Whether in response to political pressure, budget cuts, or leadership shifts, the assumption seems to be that without these programs, the conversation around bias and discrimination will simply disappear. But here’s the reality: removing a program does not eliminate the problem. In fact, it increases liability, making companies more vulnerable to discrimination claims, hostile work environment lawsuits, and even class action litigation.
DEI as a Guardrail, Not a Trend
Rolling back a program meant to protect your company from liability is like removing the guardrails on a winding mountain road—just because you don’t see the edge doesn’t mean the drop isn’t there.
DEI programs don’t just promote inclusivity; they act as risk management tools. They provide companies with structured ways to identify, address, and mitigate workplace bias before it escalates into legally actionable discrimination. Without these measures in place, businesses are left exposed to risks they may not even recognize—until it’s too late.
Cracker Barrel learned this the hard way. A class-action lawsuit in the early 2000s exposed widespread racial discrimination in hiring, pay, and promotions, as well as segregation of Black customers. This resulted in an $8.7 million settlement and government intervention mandating nondiscrimination policies and compliance training. The lack of structured DEI mechanisms didn’t protect Cracker Barrel from liability—it made the company more vulnerable to it.
The New Administration’s Distraction and Its Dangerous Oversight
The new administration and its allies are pushing for the removal of DEI programs with no recommendation on what to do in lieu of them. In response to growing political scrutiny, companies like Target have scaled back DEI, cutting funding for supplier diversity and racial equity initiatives. This is not about compliance or risk mitigation—it’s about political distraction. Meanwhile, the legal framework around discrimination, hostile work environments, and retaliation has not changed. If companies blindly follow the administration’s lead and remove these programs without an alternative plan, they are setting themselves up for massive liability.
Corporate leaders should not let political rhetoric dictate risk management—especially when those recommending the rollback of DEI programs are offering zero guidance on how to prevent discrimination-related lawsuits in their absence.
When Bias Becomes a Legal Issue
Bias in the workplace, on its own, may not always be illegal. But when it shapes decisions, policies, and workplace culture in a way that negatively impacts protected groups, it crosses into discrimination, retaliation, and harassment—all of which are legally enforceable under federal and state laws.
Here’s how bias turns into legal liability:
Disparate Treatment: When individuals are intentionally treated differently based on race, gender, disability, or other protected characteristics.
Disparate Impact: When a company policy appears neutral but disproportionately harms certain groups (even if unintentionally).
Hostile Work Environment: When bias creates an environment where employees feel unsafe, unwelcome, or subject to harassment.
Retaliation: When employees who report bias or discrimination face consequences like demotion, exclusion, or termination.
All of these can lead to lawsuits, financial penalties, and irreparable reputational damage. DEI programs help companies stay ahead of these risks by fostering fair processes, training employees to recognize and reduce bias, and creating accountability mechanisms.
CHROs and General Counsels Are Losing Sleep Over This
For those paying attention, the legal risks are clear. CHROs, General Counsels, and other HR leaders are likely unable to sleep at night watching this train wreck unfold. They can already see the storm coming—a wave of lawsuits, reputational damage, and organizational chaos as companies remove DEI programs without a safety net. HR professionals have spent years ensuring compliance, minimizing risk, and building protections that are now being recklessly dismantled. They know what’s coming, and it’s an HR nightmare.
If corporate leaders think removing DEI will insulate them from controversy, history suggests otherwise. Coca-Cola’s failure to address bias didn’t shield it from lawsuits—it cost the company nearly $200 million in damages and forced them to implement more oversight than they would have if DEI had been prioritized from the start.
If you are in a leadership role and you aren’t asking your legal team about the risks of removing DEI, you are already behind. The companies that will survive this moment with minimal damage are those that recognize that risk management is not optional—it’s a necessity.
The Myth of ‘We Don’t Need DEI’
A common argument from companies rolling back DEI is: “We don’t need formal programs because we treat everyone equally.” The problem? The absence of DEI doesn’t create equality—it creates blind spots.
When companies remove DEI initiatives, they eliminate the very structures that ensure fairness in hiring, promotions, and workplace culture. Without these checks and balances, the risk of discrimination (intentional or not) rises. And when that happens, businesses are not only on the wrong side of ethics but also the wrong side of the law.
What Happens When DEI Programs Disappear?
Companies that eliminate DEI programs often face:
Higher rates of turnover among employees from historically underrepresented backgrounds.
Increased EEOC complaints and internal grievances.
Greater reputational damage when workplace discrimination cases become public.
Consumer backlash, as seen with Target, which is now facing a progressive-led boycott—including a 40-day fast—after scaling back its DEI commitments.
Difficulty attracting top talent, as younger generations and high-performing professionals prioritize inclusive workplaces.
DEI Is a Compliance Strategy, Not Just a Culture Initiative
Even without a formal DEI program, companies are still bound by legal obligations under:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (race, gender, religion, national origin discrimination)
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
Equal Pay Act
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
State and local anti-discrimination laws
Eliminating DEI efforts doesn’t remove the need for compliance—it increases the likelihood of violations. If an organization removes DEI but fails to track whether bias turns into discrimination, they’re essentially gambling with their legal standing.
What Companies Should Be Doing Instead
If leaders are reconsidering DEI initiatives, the smart approach is to reframe them as legal and risk management strategies. Here’s how:
Focus on Compliance-Based Opportunities – Ensure hiring, promotions, and workplace policies align with anti-discrimination laws.
Use Data to Track Bias – Regularly analyze hiring, retention, and pay data to identify disparities.
Train Managers to Prevent Liability – Teach leaders how to recognize and address bias before it escalates.
Implement Anonymous Reporting Systems – Give employees a way to report bias without fear of retaliation.
Audit and Adjust Policies Regularly – Ensure policies don’t unintentionally exclude or disadvantage certain groups.
Final Thought: Don’t Invite a Lawsuit
Removing DEI initiatives in today’s workplace is not a neutral act—it’s a liability risk. Bias exists whether or not we acknowledge it, and without proactive measures in place, companies are setting themselves up for discrimination claims that could have been prevented.
In the end, DEI isn’t just about “diversity.” It’s about fairness, compliance, and protecting the business from legal exposure. If companies don’t take the responsibility of addressing bias seriously, the courts—and class action lawsuits—will do it for them.
